The hulking power plant set against the green countryside of Punjab state in northwest India does not look like a source of renewable energy. Yet filling its stockyard, instead of mounds of coal, are bales of rice straw. Machines break up the heavy straw cubes as men with pitchforks hoist fibrous mounds onto a conveyor belt leading to the power plant. Handkerchiefs cover their faces to protect them from dust swirling in the air.
This is Punjab Biomass Power, a plant near the village of Ghanaur that
collects the straw collected from farmers tilling the lush fields of the
surrounding countryside. After harvest, they would normally burn this
agricultural waste, inedible to people and animals, to clear fields for
wheat crops, as farmers across India do, and in that way contribute to
the country’s dire air pollution. But at Punjab Biomass, 120,000 tons of
rice straw a year are instead burned to generate 12 megawatts of
electricity for the state’s power grid.
The plant produces emissions, although its filters reduce the amount
that outdoor burning would generate. But such biomass energy in theory
is considered carbon-neutral because of what these plants use as fuel —
like sugar cane pulp and nut shells that took carbon dioxide out of the
atmosphere as it grew. Biomass power plants are eligible for carbon
credits that translate into cash, and Punjab Biomass hopes to eventually
earn hundreds of thousands of dollars a year from the plant.
Yet biomass is far from a solution to the enormous energy needs of India
and its 1.2 billion people. Alternative energy, like wind, biomass and
solar, accounted for less than 8 percent of India’s power generation in
2009. Still, because India imports about 70 percent of its oil
and natural gas and relies on coal for more than half of its
electricity generation, it must consider all options for energy.
In April, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh called for a doubling of India’s
nonconventional energy supply, including biomass, from 25,000 megawatts
in 2012 to 55,000 megawatts by 2017. “Energy is both scarce and
expensive and yet it is vital for development,” said Mr. Singh at the Clean Energy Ministerial
in New Delhi. Developing countries “have to expand all sources of
supply, including both conventional and nonconventional energy,” he
said.
Agricultural waste in India is abundant, since roughly 60 percent of its
population relies on agriculture for a living. Sunil Dhingra, a senior
fellow at the Energy Resources Institute (TERI), a Delhi-based policy
center, estimated that India produced 600 million tons of such
“agro-waste” each year, 150 to 200 tons of which are not used. This is
“a big resource that needs to be channelized,” he said.
Some European countries have already successfully harnessed biomass
energy. In Finland, biomass such as leaves and wood from its abundant,
managed forest industry accounts for 20 percent of the energy supply,
according to the European Biomass Industry Association. Sixteen percent
of Sweden’s energy comes from biomass. And nearly half of upper
Austria’s renewable energy comes from biomass; the region aims to use
renewable energy for all of its heat and energy demand by 2030.
Punjab Biomass began operations in November 2010 after converting the
existing coal power plant at the site, an option less expensive than
building a new plant or solar or wind farm. In Britain and other parts
of Europe, some coal-fired plants are converting to biomass to comply
with new European environmental regulations, said David Hostert, an
analyst with Bloomberg New Energy Finance in London.
In India, biomass has the potential to generate at least 18,000
megawatts of electricity, according to the country’s Ministry of New and
Renewable Energy. Biomass energy can be produced through big power
plants but also in small, rural gasifiers for grass-roots industries
like brick kilns. Mr. Dhingra of TERI estimated that there were 800 to 900 biomass power plants and 3,000 small thermal gasifiers across India.
Biomass energy also generates extra income for Indian farmers. Punjab
Biomass pays 15,000 farmers about 500 rupees, about $8, per acre of rice
straw that would otherwise be burned.
But there are many challenges to expanding biomass energy, especially
collecting, storing and transporting the agricultural waste to power
plants. Most farms are fragmented, without organized disposal
operations, so energy companies need fleets of threshers and tractors to
collect agro-waste from fields. Enough fodder to run a power plant for
11 months must be collected and stored. Punjab Biomass runs mainly on
rice straw, but it is considering other agro-waste unfit for livestock,
like corn and cotton stalks and sugar cane waste to supplement its
current supply.
Biomass is stored in enormous depots and must be kept dry even in
India’s heavy rains. Companies must get clearance for large swaths of
land to store fodder — no easy task in bureaucratic India. Murad Ali
Baig, director of Bermaco Energy Systems, one of the partners in the
Punjab plant, admitted that getting the plant running “should have taken
18 months but took four years.” The logistics of storing and
transporting fodder and maintaining fuel-guzzling equipment is far more
complicated than it seems in unpredictable India. “It’s been bloody hard
work,” said Mr. Baig.
The company is operationally profitable, but still has losses from its
first couple of years of business. Still, the company aims to build
eight more rice-straw energy plants in Punjab state to generate 96
megawatts of electricity by 2017. Across India, Bermaco hopes to set up
about 20 biomass plants generating 240 megawatts during the next three
years and about 1,000 megawatts in the next six years.
While there is potential for biomass energy in India, the country lacks
the efficiency, logistical infrastructure and investments of countries
like Finland. There, the public and private sector have invested heavily
in research and development. Huge warehouses store leaves and wood to
ensure steady, efficient supplies of fodder from well-managed forests.
In India, biomass “is low-tech, but let’s invest, like the example we’ve
seen in Europe,” Mr. Dhingra of TERI, said. “Industry, academia and
government all work on one platform there. You don’t see that happening
here.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic.